They have done it with little more than a handshake agreement. Democrats
will not die on the sword of bringing Planned Parenthood back into the
fold, and Republicans will not put up additional barriers to women’s
access to care.
“The major difference is we’re not fighting about it. We’re just doing
what’s right for women and the state,” State Representative Sarah Davis,
Republican of West University Place, said last month at a Texas Tribune
symposium on health care.
There has not been a drawn-out public debate on abortion or women’s
health in either chamber this legislative session. None of the 24
abortion-related bills filed have reached the House or Senate floor. And
Ms. Davis, the only Republican member of the House Women’s Health
Caucus, brokered a bipartisan grand bargain, as lawmakers refer to it,
to prevent amendments to the House budget bill that could have
jeopardized an agreement to restore women’s health dollars.
For some Republicans, this bargain hinged on the ballot box: Ms. Davis
said several of her colleagues had faced blistering attacks after last
session’s family-planning cuts — an effort, in part, to drive Planned
Parenthood out of business — closed clinics in their districts that were
not affiliated with abortion providers.
Ms. Davis, a breast cancer
survivor who opposes abortion but will not support legislation she
believes interferes with the doctor-patient relationship, said the best
way she had found to help low-income women was “to remove emotion” from
the debate. The arguments about abortion and Planned Parenthood in 2011
“did not advance the ball,” she said. “In fact, it just threw family
planning into a tailspin.”
Bolstered by the Tea Party’s
gains in the state’s 2010 elections, last session’s ultraconservative
Legislature approved a law requiring women seeking an abortion to have a
sonogram and hear a description of the fetus at least 24 hours before
the procedure. In a targeted effort to exclude Planned Parenthood and
other clinics affiliated with abortion providers from taxpayer-financed
programs, lawmakers also cut the state’s family-planning budget by
two-thirds.
As a direct result, 117 Texas family-planning clinics stopped receiving
state financing and 56 of those clinics closed, according to researchers
at the University of Texas at Austin who are conducting a three-year
study to evaluate the Legislature’s policy changes.
The researchers estimate that 144,000 fewer women received health
services and 30,000 fewer unintended pregnancies were averted in 2012
than in 2010. The state’s savings from the programs dropped by an
estimated $163 million.
“A lot of people really felt they got snookered by some of the people in
the pro-life movement about that family-planning issue,” said State
Senator Bob Deuell, Republican of Greenville, who has been a strong
advocate for restoring family-planning financing for low-income women by
way of primary care.
No comments:
Post a Comment